This is the sustainability article I'd actually want on the site.
London has huge numbers of older homes. Improving those buildings can mean better insulation, glazing, heating systems, ventilation and lower energy consumption.
Sounds straightforward.
Except somebody has to pay for it.
That's where the article becomes interesting.
A landlord with an older Victorian rental may face thousands of pounds of improvement costs. The tenant would benefit from a warmer and potentially cheaper-to-run home. Government wants housing to become more energy efficient. But if the cost of upgrading rental stock becomes too high, some landlords may sell, reduce investment or attempt to recover costs through rent where the market permits.
So the article investigates the tension between three things everybody wants simultaneously:
better homes + lower emissions + affordable rent.
Rather than pretending there's an easy answer, we'd look at the age of London's housing stock, retrofit challenges, energy efficiency, landlord economics and what sensible incremental improvement actually looks like.
That gives Sustainability a proper property-business issue to discuss rather than another “use LED bulbs and recycle” article.
DISCLAIMER- THIS PHOTO HAS BEEN TAKEN FROM PINTEREST ( AMIRA SALLAM)